Public Forum

If anyone wishes to contact me privately

here is my email address link.

Ā 

Jim Sullivan

Comments

Please enter the code ↺
* Required fields
  • Hit a nerve (Friday, July 03 26 10:24 pm EDT)

    Wow, that Topstone discussion really touched a nerve. Let’s see if Nicky gives us another show and flips the whole table over this one.

  • Public service announcement (Friday, July 03 26 10:18 pm EDT)

    Wow. Some of the comments on this forum lately make Chief Chamberlain’s psychiatry app idea look less like a city program and more like a public service announcement.

  • Nikki wild donkey rider (Friday, July 03 26 10:08 pm EDT)

    Yes, Nikki has been writing the Claremont taxpayer like his own little private donkey for years when a sicko go stroke your

  • Nikkiā€˜s pride and Joy (Friday, July 03 26 10:02 pm EDT)

    What should matter most to the taxpayers of Claremont is simple: what has cost the public the most?

    In my opinion, the Topstone building belongs at the top of that list.

    Nick Koloski has treated that little Topstone building like his pride and joy, but the public still deserves straight answers. How much did this project cost the taxpayers? Who benefited? What was promised? What was delivered? And why does it feel like the citizens were left holding the bag?

    This is not about personalities. It is about public money, public trust, and public accountability.

    Claremont taxpayers deserve a full explanation of how this deal happened, who signed off on it, and whether the public got value for its money — or got taken for a ride.

    No more political fog machine. Come clean. Put the numbers on the table.

  • Tasha (Friday, July 03 26 10:36 am EDT)

    Is anybody going to share the police report Jim reported on for the community center fraud in what’s up Claremont? I think the citizens of Claremont should know everything.

  • Guy (Thursday, July 02 26 09:12 pm EDT)

    How many requests? Sullivan and Gauthier refuse to answer the question........why?
    Are you too afraid to tell the truth about how many requests you have made to the city and school system?

  • AI (Thursday, July 02 26 06:31 pm EDT)

    This writing has many of the hallmarks of AI-generated content. Nearly every post follows the exact same formula:

    It opens with a dramatic, emotionally loaded statement.
    It broadens a single issue into a sweeping claim about the entire city.
    It repeats the same sentence structure and cadence found in previous posts.
    It offers broad accusations with little supporting detail.
    It closes with a dramatic conclusion calling for "accountability" without offering any practical solutions.

    After seeing enough of these posts, the pattern becomes unmistakable. The wording, rhythm, transitions, and overall structure are nearly identical every time. Whether the topic is the Visitor Center, a personnel matter, a budget issue, or another city concern, it is simply the same template with different names inserted.

    Posting this same formula repeatedly in a public discussion forum adds very little to the conversation. It becomes repetitive spam rather than meaningful discussion. Raising concerns is important, but continually posting generalized comparisons and rhetorical statements without proposing solutions, identifying specific policy changes, or suggesting realistic next steps does not move the community forward.

    If the goal is to improve Claremont, then offer recommendations. Suggest maintenance schedules, budget priorities, oversight measures, ordinance changes, committee actions, or specific reforms. Those are discussions worth having.

    Simply declaring that "everything is broken," comparing unrelated situations, and ending with another call for accountability—without explaining how to achieve it—is not productive. It generates engagement but not progress.

    Public forums are at their best when they encourage informed discussion, fact-based debate, and practical ideas. Repeatedly posting the same AI-style narrative, regardless of the topic, risks turning the conversation into an echo chamber of generic complaints rather than a place where actual solutions can be explored.

  • Gabby (Thursday, July 02 26 12:17 pm EDT)

    Who takes care of the planters on pleasant street? They don’t look very good.

  • Ricky (Thursday, July 02 26 10:30 am EDT)

    Funny DPW has mowers shouldn’t mow it?

  • It@hotmail.com (Thursday, July 02 26 10:28 am EDT)

    How can someone tell me to cut my grass when the city won’t cut there own. Rules don’t apply to city property?

  • Revolving door (Thursday, July 02 26 09:26 am EDT)

    Another symptom of this failed government here in Claremont, the revolving city manager door I agree, broken by design

  • Erosion of public trust (Thursday, July 02 26 09:18 am EDT)

    The Visitor Center is not just a maintenance problem. It is a symptom.

    When grass is left overgrown, buildings are allowed to fall apart, repairs go unexplained, and taxpayers are left guessing, people notice. They may not know every detail inside City Hall, but they can smell neglect from the sidewalk.

    And that is the larger problem in Claremont.

    The city too often appears broken by design. Not broken because nobody knows better. Broken because a broken system benefits certain people. When government becomes confusing, delayed, disorganized, and secretive, accountability gets buried. The taxpayers get the bill, and the insiders keep moving the pieces around the board.

    The Visitor Center is one example. The Justin Martin credit card case is another.

    If public money was misused, the public deserves a full accounting. Not a soft landing. Not a quiet shuffle. Not a carefully worded explanation that tells taxpayers almost nothing. Every city credit card should be audited. Every approval chain should be reviewed. Every department with access to taxpayer funds should be examined.

    And yes, if the facts support felony charges, then felony charges should be pursued. Public trust is not restored by minimizing wrongdoing. It is restored by exposing it, correcting it, and holding people accountable.

    Claremont cannot keep treating these scandals and failures like isolated accidents. The pattern is becoming too obvious: neglected property, unanswered questions, nonpublic meetings, financial fog, and citizens forced to dig through RSA 91-A requests just to find out what their own government is doing.

    That is not transparency. That is managed decay.

    A city government that works for the people maintains public property, protects public money, answers public questions, and respects public trust.

    Right now, Claremont looks like a city where the taxpayers are expected to pay for the mess while being told not to ask who made it.

    That is backward. And it needs to stop.

  • Richard (Thursday, July 02 26 09:07 am EDT)

    They actually deserve more than $22,000 for doing the work of 3. Shut up and mind your own business.

  • Tim Mulligan (Thursday, July 02 26 09:04 am EDT)

    Pack up the employees at the visitor center and move them somewhere else. The place is a money pit.

  • Eric (Thursday, July 02 26 08:40 am EDT)

    Is it just me or is the city letting the visitors center fall apart. Grass is overgrown and still no word on why it’s not getting fixed. The city should be ashamed.

  • Better watch out (Thursday, July 02 26 08:17 am EDT)

    You be surprise how many department heads/employees use the city credit cards for there personal use. I’ve seen it first hand when reviewing. Some by lunch and some by equipment that they need for there personal
    Home. Time someone takes a look at all the spending.

  • Billy Bob (Wednesday, July 01 26 07:32 pm EDT)

    Y’all are hung up on the $22,063.72 stipend, that’s not even the largest one!! Look at the one in the June 14th article you missed for $45,000!!

  • Cindy (Wednesday, July 01 26 06:44 pm EDT)

    We don’t have a school board meeting tonight. Remember?

  • Rebecca (Wednesday, July 01 26 06:34 pm EDT)

    $22,063.72
    $22,063.72
    $22,063.72
    $22,063.72

  • Reed (Wednesday, July 01 26 04:35 pm EDT)

    They are really good friends and friends don’t like to see each other get in trouble.

  • Big shit (Wednesday, July 01 26 04:28 pm EDT)

    So how does Christopher Irish is involved with Justin Martin in the theft must be a connection there

  • Madden (Wednesday, July 01 26 04:08 pm EDT)

    Watch the school board meeting tonight some school board officials will be questioning the new superintendent about the staffing updates as what he has said in the past does not match up with what is actually vacant in the school district. When he said last time we hired multiple new positions we were hovering around 63 vacancies in the school district. We are now hovering around 67 vacancies in the school district.

  • How many requests (Wednesday, July 01 26 04:01 pm EDT)

    Still waiting for the number of requests made by Gauthier and Sullivan.
    "Restoring balance through full disclosure"? Show us how transparent you are.

  • City upside down (Wednesday, July 01 26 03:46 pm EDT)

    So watch dog shit sounds like someone who has a lot to lose in this upside down twist attorney government here maybe even Chris Irish

  • WatchdogShit (Wednesday, July 01 26 02:36 pm EDT)

    Wasted Public Trust is Sullivan, Gauthier, and ChatGPT

  • City friend (Wednesday, July 01 26 12:06 pm EDT)

    So speaks of the city bureaucracy

  • Santaw (Wednesday, July 01 26 11:06 am EDT)

    Jim will probably miss the fact those funds are not connected to the main budget for next year and can only collect funds from rate payers within the system. You can't backdate bills and ask for more if you are short. It will be reflected in the enterprise fund. Jim will report enough to get clicks and get people up in arms but will not explain how enterprise funds operate or TIF districts. You should take medical advice from Jim as well. He is a self proclaimed expert in everything. Just ask him.

  • Wasted public trust (Wednesday, July 01 26 11:03 am EDT)

    Public trust in Claremont is wearing thin, and that did not happen by accident.

    When taxpayers ask reasonable questions and get vague answers, delayed records, missing explanations, closed-door meetings, and political spin, the result is predictable: people stop trusting the system.

    That is where Claremont is right now.

    Some folks seem more upset that citizens are asking questions than they are about the problems being uncovered. That says a lot. When people attack Jim Sullivan, Francis Gauthier, the Sullivan Report, or even the use of AI to organize public records and public information, they are not answering the facts. They are trying to distract from them.

    The real issue is simple:

    Why does it take so much digging to find out what is happening inside our own city government?

    Why are taxpayers constantly forced to use RSA 91-A Right-to-Know requests to obtain information that should already be public?

    Why are city credit cards, personnel decisions, spending issues, resignations, closed-door meetings, and public accountability treated like private business?

    No citizen should have to apologize for asking questions. No local watchdog should be mocked for demanding transparency. And no public official should expect blind trust after the public has been given every reason to doubt the process.

    This is not about personal grudges. It is about public money, public records, public decisions, and public trust.

    If Claremont officials want trust restored, the path is not complicated: answer questions directly, post more records publicly, stop hiding behind procedure, and treat taxpayers like the owners of the government—not the problem.

    Until then, the questions will continue.

    And they should.

    Truth does not fear public records. Honest government does not fear sunlight.

  • Amy (Wednesday, July 01 26 10:16 am EDT)

    Do people who have their own sewer and well still have to subsidize the water and sewer in town with taxes or is it just on their water and sewer bills? I would hate to get taxed on something that the city won’t even let me hook up to.

  • Steve (Wednesday, July 01 26 08:59 am EDT)

    I saw Jim Sullivan at the gas station this morning. We talked about last night's council meeting. Jim said councilors talked about the general fund budget that just ended but ignored the bottom line budget deficits for the Tif, Water & Sewer budgets. Jim said the water budget deficit is huge and the sewer has budget is big. Jim said councilors are not representing the citizens. He is doing a story about this Sunday.

  • Bronco (Wednesday, July 01 26 12:26 am EDT)

    Justin used to be my kids camp counselor and he used to drive my kid around in the van they had. I felt like I failed as a parent by allowing a city of Claremont employee who drinks on the job and commits credit card fraud to watch my child all summer long. I was told this man was trained and safe for children. Clearly I was lied to by the city.

  • Gregory (Tuesday, June 30 26 08:32 pm EDT)

    Listen real close to the audio when Irish whispers we can add it to tonight's meeting. That would be a topic not advertised to the public he is referencing. The same guy who Derek Ellerkamp is praising online for arguing a council rep being added to a seat just can't happen at a meeting without it being publicy noticed. Unfortunately Chris should read the agenga. Future agenda items and directives allows such. A motion can be made during pubic meetings. Start writing down everything the guy says. You will able to see a pattern and cross out his comment when he violates his own lecturing.

    The same guy offers his "opinion" to the City manager if I am understanding Jim Sullivan correctly about Justin Martin's employment. His friend Justin Martin? His softball buddy?

    I am told by one of the very few attendees of council meetings, Irish was in the council chamber hallway trying to get councilors to reverse their votes on water and sewer during the break.

    Irish speaking out against the things he and he alone does and pretends he is speaking for many.

    Chris, you are a boob!

  • Patrick (Tuesday, June 30 26 08:16 pm EDT)

    Imagine getting a $22,063.72 bonus on top of multiple other bonuses. Is that the highest stipend recipient so far???

  • Wake up, Claremont (Tuesday, June 30 26 06:09 pm EDT)

    Facebook link to the Justin Martin theft case credit card Fraud everybody needs to read this wake up Claremont
    https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1KvEy8Ricc/?mibextid=wwXIfr

  • Jim Sullivan (Tuesday, June 30 26 05:39 pm EDT)

    Special Report!

    Claremont Police Chief Brent Wilmot Releases Preliminary Claremont Savings Bank Community Center Fraud Investigation Documents!

  • Response to response to Betty M (Tuesday, June 30 26 12:45 pm EDT)

    Yeah and you farted last time I went to walk in your office for advice. It smelled like rotten eggs.

  • Jack (Tuesday, June 30 26 11:01 am EDT)

    Anybody know the school board agenda for Wednesday?

  • Alex (Tuesday, June 30 26 10:46 am EDT)

    Francis your AI writing style is boring and the same everytime. Here is the pattern. Its not about....it's blah, blah, blah and blah. Come up with something original. Nobody is going to respond with what you ask each time as they are all smart enough to not spend time when you are just copy, pasting and asking AI to counter. Use your real name and stop being so ignorant. Try just trying.

  • Requests? (Monday, June 29 26 09:57 pm EDT)

    How many requests have you made? Simple question requires a simple answer.

  • The public need fair answers (Monday, June 29 26 08:50 pm EDT)

    The timing certainly raises fair public questions.

    Nancy Bates announced her departure around the same period the Justin Martin credit card fraud situation came into public view, and she reportedly cited stress serious enough to affect her health. That does not prove wrongdoing by her or anyone else, but it does make the public’s demand for answers completely reasonable.

    If a city employee is accused of misusing a city credit card, the response should not stop with one person. Every city-issued credit card, every department head with access, every approval chain, and every monthly statement should be reviewed through a full independent audit.

    This is not about rumor. It is about controls, oversight, and taxpayer money.

    The public deserves to know who had city credit cards, who approved the spending, who reviewed the statements, who signed off on reimbursements, and whether any warning signs were missed.

    Nonpublic meetings should not become a hiding place for uncomfortable facts. Personnel and legal issues may require privacy in some areas, but the financial controls, audit results, and taxpayer impact should be made public.

    Claremont needs a full accounting, not another fog bank from City Hall.

  • Public information is not the property of government (Monday, June 29 26 08:40 pm EDT)

    That is a fair question, but it misses the larger issue.

    If the city and school district answered basic public questions clearly, posted more public records online, and operated with real transparency, there would be far less need for RSA 91-A Right-to-Know requests in the first place.

    Right-to-Know requests are not the problem. They are the remedy when government becomes too quiet, too guarded, or too selective with information that belongs to the public.

    Taxpayers should not have to dig, pry, and wait just to find out how their money is being spent, what decisions are being made, who is involved, and whether public officials are following the law.

    The easiest way to reduce 91-A requests is simple: post the records, answer the questions, and stop treating public information like private property.

    Transparency builds trust. Secrecy destroys it.

  • Curious (Monday, June 29 26 07:15 pm EDT)

    How many request from our schools and city have Gauthier and Sullivan requested in the past year?
    Just curious, I'm sure this website can answer that simply enough because it prides itself on the truth and facts I'm told.

  • Cindy (Monday, June 29 26 05:57 pm EDT)

    So on a post made by Derek Ellerkamp someone said they have seen elected officials dining at the common man and raumontos together. Doesn’t this go against the law?

  • spining (Monday, June 29 26 05:17 pm EDT)

    The question is Nancy play a part in the Martin fiasco hence the non public meeting? considering the announcement of here departure at the same time. As Mr. Sullivan has previously pointed out that criminal events involving staff besides the manger can at least be discussed beyond that it is unknown what they can do from there. As I said and might be more straight forwarded the manger was involved in some way.

  • Hillary (Monday, June 29 26 12:39 pm EDT)

    We have such a great police department in this city.

  • Response to Betty M (Monday, June 29 26 07:21 am EDT)

    Betty M - You get that much when there are supposed to be 3 counselors, and they only hire 1

  • Good old boy, Chris Irish (Monday, June 29 26 06:33 am EDT)

    Vicky, that is a funny way to frame it, because Chris Irish is not some outsider rattling the cage of the ā€œgood old boys.ā€

    In my opinion, Chris Irish looks like one of the original good-old-boy operators in Claremont politics.

    He knows the system. He knows the pressure points. He knows how to work a room, demand attention, and make himself a royal pain in the backside when he wants something. Sometimes that can be useful. Other times, it looks like the same old insider game with a different name tag.

    And yes, from where I sit, it sure looked like he was running interference around the Justin Martin/community center mess while Nancy Bates was still in the picture. That whole situation deserves sunlight, not excuses, not political fog, and not another round of ā€œnothing to see here.ā€

    So before anyone crowns Chris Irish as some brave rebel against the good-old-boy network, let’s slow the parade down.

    Being loud does not make you independent. Being aggressive does not make you clean. And getting under someone’s skin does not automatically mean you are serving the taxpayer.

    The real test is simple: did you help expose the mess, or did you help protect the system?

    Because Claremont has had enough insiders playing watchdog while the taxpayers get handed the bill.

  • Betty M (Monday, June 29 26 05:48 am EDT)

    How does someone get a $22k stipend for ā€œadditional counseling dutiesā€????
    Outrageous

  • No Question (Sunday, June 28 26 08:22 pm EDT)

    Chris was 100% trying to run interference for Justin with Nancy.

  • Vicky (Sunday, June 28 26 08:10 pm EDT)

    Some days I hate Chris on the council but other days I love seeing him get under the good ole boys skin on the council and making them panic and sweat bullets.

Print | Sitemap
RESTORING BALANCE THROUGH FULL DISCLOSURE