Public Forum

If anyone wishes to contact me privately

here is my email address link.

 

Jim Sullivan

Comments

Please enter the code ↺
* Required fields

  • Sorum Fummary (Thursday, October 01 26 10:36 am EDT)

    Reading the first"Forum summary" comment, there are several weaknesses you could legitimately challenge:

    1. It shifts the burden of proof

    The author repeatedly says critics have not produced "receipts," "documents," or factual rebuttals, while simultaneously advancing suspicions of their own.

    Example:

    "I am beginning to suspect that at least some of these hecklers belong to, work around, benefit from, or instinctively defend Claremont's self-appointed 'super-intelligent' governing class."

    The author immediately admits this is only an impression, yet spends an entire paragraph building a narrative around it. That's the same kind of speculation they criticize others for using.

    2. False dilemma

    The comment presents only two possibilities:

    People answer questions with documents and evidence.
    People are hecklers protecting the system.

    Reality is more complicated. A person could believe Sullivan is wrong, disorganized, biased, repetitive, or misleading without being part of a government cover-up.

    3. It dismisses criticism too easily

    The summary acknowledges one criticism:

    "hundreds of archive links could be organized and indexed more effectively."

    Then it largely waves it away because critics did not identify a fraudulent document or fabricated number. Those are not the only standards by which a publication can be criticized. Usability, organization, writing quality, sourcing, context, and editorial judgment are all valid subjects of criticism.

    4. Assumes motives without evidence

    The author says critics appear to be:

    "people protecting a system rather than examining it."

    There is no evidence presented for that conclusion. It is mind-reading. The author correctly notes anonymous commenters cannot be identified, then essentially proceeds to infer their motivations anyway.

    5. Confuses popularity with significance

    The author argues that because critics spend time reading and commenting, the publication must matter.

    That does not necessarily follow. People spend significant time criticizing things they dislike. Someone commenting frequently is not evidence that the underlying reporting is accurate or influential.

    6. Lack of specific examples

    The piece repeatedly references important issues:

    school finances
    special education compliance
    forensic audits
    hiring concerns
    transparency

    But it does not actually demonstrate that any of the underlying allegations are true. It argues these questions deserve answers, which is fair. However, asking a question is not the same thing as proving a problem exists.

    A stronger criticism you could make

    Instead of attacking the AI used to write it, I'd hit the logic:

    "The summary demands evidence from critics while relying on speculation about critics' motives. It argues that anonymous commenters are undermining serious discussion, yet spends a substantial portion of the piece speculating about who those commenters might be and what interests they serve. If evidence is the standard, it should apply equally to both sides."

  • Forum summary (Thursday, October 01 26 09:42 am EDT)

    Sullivan Report Public Forum Summary — October 1, 2026

    One correction: the “Forum summary” entry is timestamped 12:43 a.m. EDT, not 12:43 p.m. It was followed by four newer comments.

    The 12:43 a.m. summary draws a useful distinction between legitimate public concerns and anonymous heckling. It identifies serious matters still requiring answers: school finances, special-education compliance, the delayed forensic audit, missing stipend records, municipal hiring, housing, and government transparency.

    What followed largely proved its point.

    “si overwatch” quoted Proverbs 26:4 about not answering fools but offered no factual rebuttal. “Frank Gauth” published a lengthy parody mocking the Sullivan Report’s archives, documents, numbered articles, and presentation. Buried beneath the sarcasm is one fair criticism: hundreds of archive links could be organized and indexed more effectively. However, the commenter identified no fraudulent document, incorrect expenditure, fabricated quotation, or false financial figure.

    “jerry p” then joked that “SI” refused to analyze the website. Finally, “conspiracy” asked whether Jim and Francis maintain a red-yarn diagram in the basement. Another joke—but still no receipt.

    Here is my personal opinion: I am beginning to suspect that at least some of these hecklers belong to, work around, benefit from, or instinctively defend Claremont’s self-appointed “super-intelligent” governing class.

    That is an impression, not a proven identification. Anonymous display names do not reveal who is behind the keyboard, and I will not declare somebody a city employee without evidence. Nevertheless, the pattern is worth noticing.

    Whenever questions arise about City Hall, SAU 6, missing records, questionable expenditures, employee qualifications, or administrative failures, the same style of response appears: mock the messenger, ridicule the research, complain about artificial intelligence, and steer attention away from the documents.

    Perhaps these are merely unaffiliated residents with an unusual emotional attachment to municipal bureaucracy. Perhaps some have government connections. The forum alone cannot settle that question.

    But their conduct creates the appearance of people protecting a system rather than examining it.

    The contradiction remains delicious: they claim the Sullivan Report is irrelevant, yet read it closely enough to critique its menus, archives, article numbers, writing style, technology, authors, and punctuation. For a publication nobody supposedly reads, it has attracted a remarkably dedicated unpaid review committee.

    The ball remains in their court. Identify the false statement. Produce the correcting document. Explain the disputed expenditure. Answer the public question.

    Otherwise, the “super-intelligent class” is merely heckling from the balcony while taxpayers examine the books.

    Biblical principle: “For every one that doeth evil hateth the light.” —John 3:20. Public officials and their defenders should answer honest questions with records, not ridicule.

  • conspiracy (Thursday, October 01 26 09:32 am EDT)

    do we think Jim and Fran have a red yarn diagram in the basement?

  • jerry p (Thursday, October 01 26 09:04 am EDT)

    I asked si to analyze this site and it said “no”
    why? I am just asking questions.

  • Frank Gauth (Thursday, October 01 26 08:04 am EDT)

    Sullivan Report: Drunk Monkey Edition

    "HELLO CITIZENS!!!

    I HAVE IMPORTANT NEWS!!!

    First, here are approximately 317,000 news archives. Nobody knows why. We just keep making them. Archive 1. Archive 2. Archive 3. Archive 147. Archive 305. Archive 316. If you can't find what you're looking for, try another archive. Then another. Then maybe all of them.

    ALSO:

    Fraud stuff.
    Court stuff.
    Fire stuff.
    City Manager stuff.
    Internal Affairs stuff.
    Employment stuff.
    Municipal building stuff.
    A guy named Yoshi apparently has opinions.
    Somebody crashed a cruiser.
    LED lights happened.
    Audits happened.
    Counterproposals happened.
    More counterproposals happened.

    WE HAVE DOCUMENTS.

    SO MANY DOCUMENTS.

    Documents about documents.

    Documents that reference other documents.

    Documents which may exist solely to discuss previous documents.

    Anyway, today's exciting update is that six new articles were published. We have thoughtfully labeled them:

    Article #1
    Article #2
    Article #3
    Article #4
    Article #5
    Article #6

    Because naming things is hard and we had important keyboard pounding to do.

    There is also a Dublin Advocate article. Why? Don't ask questions.

    The website slogan is:

    'RESTORING BALANCE THROUGH FULL DISCLOSURE'

    Which appears to mean:

    'If we acquire one more PDF, we achieve enlightenment.'

    Thank you for attending today's municipal conspiracy scavenger hunt. Please enjoy the remaining 316 archives on your way out."

    In all seriousness, the page looks less like a news site and more like someone emptied an entire filing cabinet onto the internet and said, "You figure it out."

  • si overwatch (Thursday, October 01 26 07:04 am EDT)

    Proverbs 26:4 do not answer a fool according to his folly

  • Forum summary (Thursday, October 01 26 12:43 am EDT)

    The Sullivan Report Public Forum: Serious Questions Amid the Noise

    The Sullivan Report public forum has become a crowded intersection of taxpayer concerns, political arguments, and anonymous heckling. Some contributors bring useful information. Others bring a keyboard and apparently very little restraint.

    Through September 30, the latest posts included unsupported claims that a White House memorandum prohibited Francis Gauthier from using artificial intelligence, declarations that commenters had taken over the website, and repeated complaints about AI-assisted writing. These posts offer mockery rather than documented factual corrections.

    Elsewhere, contributors trade inflammatory accusations and defenses concerning Jon Stone and Mayor Dale Girard. Serious allegations deserve examination through authenticated records, not acceptance because somebody repeats them loudly.

    Substantive discussion remains: school finances, special-education compliance, delayed audits, missing stipend records, housing, and municipal hiring. Scott Maple’s account of helping obtain parents’ signatures supplies a firsthand perspective. Other commenters raise questions about qualifications and recruitment, although their assertions require verification.

    The distinction is straightforward: criticism identifies a problem and supports it. Trolling substitutes insults, repetition, and invented scenarios.

    Anonymous posting also makes it impossible to determine whether the noise represents many residents or a few persistent contributors. Volume is no substitute for evidence. (sullivanreport.com)

    Biblical principle: Examine before judging—Proverbs 18:13. Demand the same evidence from allies and critics.

  • uncle si (Wednesday, September 30 26 08:08 pm EDT)

    fran has conceded the Sullivan report to me
    i am the captain now

    jim is our puppet
    but i won bigger than anyone has one in claremont
    super intelligent

  • si 4 lyfe (Wednesday, September 30 26 01:36 pm EDT)

    now with the memorandum the old men can have no come back because they have no more use of si (super intelligence)

    also liberal blue hairs stop spamming this site with your gayness

  • si watch puppy (Wednesday, September 30 26 07:31 am EDT)

    all of the super intelligence companies met yesterday at the White House
    they signed a memorandum to ban fran from using super intelligence copy and paste techniques for his “journalism” (allegedly)
    the ceo of Open Si described this use of his company as “troubling” and totally boring and uninspiring
    thank you for your attention to this matter

  • Ai (Tuesday, September 29 26 08:05 pm EDT)

    yes
    all your base are belong to us

  • Ai watch puppy (Tuesday, September 29 26 12:37 pm EDT)

    Looks like the whole website is now controlled by the ai

  • Fact (Tuesday, September 29 26 01:24 am EDT)

    The more you understand this world, the more you destroy yourself. That's why fools are happy, and intelligent people live in loneliness

  • Pete (Tuesday, September 29 26 12:43 am EDT)

    No one knows what it's like
    To be the bad man
    To be the sad man
    Behind blue eyes
    And no one knows what it's like
    To be hated

    To be fated to telling only lies
    But my dreams they aren't as empty

    As my conscience seems to be
    I have hours, only lonely
    My love is vengeance
    That's never free

    No one knows what it's like
    To feel these feelings
    Like I do
    And I blame you (you, you, you)
    No one bites back as hard
    On their anger

    None of my pain and woe
    Can show through
    But my dreams they aren't as empty

    As my conscience seems to be
    I have hours, only lonely
    My love is vengeance
    That's never free

    No one knows what it's like
    To be mistreated, to be defeated
    Behind blue eyes

    And no one knows how to say
    That they're sorry and don't worry
    I'm not telling lies
    But my dreams, they aren't as empty

    As my conscience seems to be
    I have hours, only lonely
    My love is vengeance
    That's never free

    No one knows what it's like
    To be the bad man
    To be the sad man
    Behind blue eyes

  • Dale = Predator Protector (Monday, September 28 26 08:13 pm EDT)

    Fuck Dale. What a piece of shit holding a campaign sign for a known predator in the town that his victims live. We need to vote that disgusting evil pig out. How many comments to this affect, and the piece of shit has not responded to put out a single statement on it.

    Either you stand with Jon Stone's victims. I do.

    You you stand with that pervert. Like Dale does.

  • We all get a bit hot headed (Monday, September 28 26 07:58 pm EDT)

    Was Jon Stone a perv and predator back in the day? Yes, but it has been a real long time. The underage girl he was paling around with is an oldie now. If she isn't over it, its her problem. He didn't kill someone. People get second chances. He's been around children since and hasn't pulled anything we know of. Hasn't been arrested. Not on the child sex predator list. He can go near schools, unlike what others have said. Give the dude a chance. He didn't actually rape the chief's wife. He just got a bit hot headed and threatened to do it.

  • Billy_Bob (Monday, September 28 26 07:33 pm EDT)

    Has it occurred to you that no one qualified is applying or accepting the job offers?
    Why don’t you apply for a city job, save the taxpayer money and lead by example and work hard for the people of Claremont?
    Maybe look into their first choice for parks and rec director and why he chose to decline the cities offer? The hiring team also declined to meet with an individual whose qualifications include an MBA in corporate finance and MS sports and entertainment management.

  • sammy boy (Monday, September 28 26 05:02 pm EDT)

    it’s really gay what has happened to what’s up Claremont
    i predict a massive decline and the once throbbing community will become flaccid and soft

  • Insider (Monday, September 28 26 03:37 pm EDT)

    Overheard the new guy complaining about hurt feelings due to reading the Sullivan report
    guys need to chill on this inspector please

  • Scott Maple (Monday, September 28 26 01:37 pm EDT)

    Good afternoon, Jim! I read the article in regard to IEP’s being out of compliance. When I was the Truancy Officer, I worked with the Special Educators, in helping those documents getting signed by parents, so that compliance would stay in effect. Not that it was part of my job description but the staff and students mattered to me, so I would help in making home visits to get those documents signed. I tried explaining this to the Superintendent but again it’s something that he either didn’t know or just didn’t want to hear.

  • William (Monday, September 28 26 06:57 am EDT)

    The finance committee members are all a piece of shit. The bottom is falling out of special education with higher costs of over $10.3 million and the revenues from the state and federal government that Claremont receives is in jeopardy of being lost because 63% of the IEP’s are not in compliance. The cause is a catastrophic failure by the school board and the administration to properly run the school district. I agree with Jim Sullivan that the $700,000 revenue figure that he found in school records is a low amount of money and is substantially higher. This could have a profound negative effect on the property tax rate in Claremont. The problems with the tuition revenues and the nearly $300,000 loss in adequacy aid on top of a budget deficit of almost $1 million that still hasn’t been quantified shows we are on the brink of financial disaster once again and the school leadership is hiding these facts from us to hide their incompetence. Thank you Jim Sullivan for showing us the truth and for having our backs when the school and city leaders do not.

  • insider (Monday, September 28 26 06:29 am EDT)

    buying houses with an inheritance and painting them funny colors is experience?

  • Mayor Dale = Piece of Shit (Monday, September 28 26 04:28 am EDT)

    What are Jon Stone's victims? The underage girl he was with, the police officers he threatened to murder for investigating the relationship with the under age girl, supposed to think when they see the MAYOR of the fucking town out campaigning for the creep that still haunts her nightmares?

    Jon Stone = Satan
    Dale Girard = Evil personified.

    I side with victims over the perverts that victimize them. Dale Girard doesn't give two shits about the victims of Jon Stone's disgusting behavior.

    Dale: have you offered to meet with the victims before you put up a sign for that monster?!?

    And what about the wife of the police chief he threatened to RAPE?!?

  • Richard (Monday, September 28 26 03:23 am EDT)

    The city councilors are to blame for all of the bad hiring choices because they and their predecessors have hired a long line of bad city managers since Guy Santagate retired. Each choice worse than the previous one. Bates was a disaster and Bergeron is a dope. The new parks and recreation director changes jobs too frequently. He can’t seem to make up his mind what he wants to be when he grows up. Like the planning and development director he does not stay at any place long and her long mental health break from working is unsettling. The new finance director has a new side hustle that she will be working on probably during the day at city hall. Just like the new superintendent at the school district. The new assistant building inspector has several side hustles and only a high school education and no practical background in code enforcement. I remember that Jim Sullivan reported how the fire chief and police chief were on the hiring team that choose these three new employees and I seem to remember they also helped choose the new planning and development director. The side hustles should have not bothered the fire chief because he has a side hustle of his own with that psychiatry app endorsement and who know what else he has going for a side hustle. All of these new employees appear to fail to meet the minimum qualifications for their positions but they were hired anyway. Mayor Girard and the other city councilors are at the top of the city’s organizational chart so the blame begins and ends with them for all of the poor hiring choices because they keep choosing unqualified city managers. All of their past bad decisions and there are so many are beginning to do serious damage to Claremont’s reputation and financial health.

  • Synopsis today’s newsflash (Sunday, September 27 26 10:28 pm EDT)

    1. School finance and special education. Sullivan says the September 15 School Board Finance Subcommittee meeting was not recorded and its minutes are too thin to explain a two-and-a-half-hour discussion. He focuses on a statement in the minutes that 63% of IEPs are out of compliance and warns of a possible loss of anticipated special education revenue. He also points to a projected $292,676.55 drop in adequacy aid. The size of any actual revenue shortfall is not established in the article.
    2. The stalled forensic audit — guest editorial by Francis Gauthier. This piece traces the audit from the district’s decision to pursue it, through hiring CBIZ, to reports that it was underway, and finally to news that it is on hold. It asks whether the auditors ever examined a transaction and calls for the board to disclose the check history, work performed, contract status, and any proposed change in scope.
    3. The missing stipend spreadsheet. Sullivan says he has spent nearly a month seeking an updated spreadsheet of employee stipends for the school year that ended June 30. He already has an earlier version, but says SAU 6 has yet to produce a later one or clearly say whether one exists. He plans to press the superintendent and board for a response under New Hampshire’s Right-to-Know law.
    4. September 23 City Council meeting. Sullivan gives a sharply critical account of the council and city manager, including public complaints raised at the meeting. Topics include the lack of a Facebook livestream, new department heads, an unpaid Visitor Center consultant bill, plans for a warming hut, housing and traffic concerns, and the council’s action on a community center funding transfer and an RSA 79-E application for 11 Main Street. Much of the piece is Sullivan’s opinion about the officials’ performance, alongside his account of meeting business.
    5. Qualifications of three city hires. Sullivan examines the publicly available backgrounds of Finance Director Maureen Hulslander, Parks and Recreation Director Patrick Saucier, and Deputy Building Inspector and Health Officer Ryan MacLeay against city job qualifications. He questions whether each has the experience the position calls for and publishes material concerning MacLeay’s résumé and training. The article raises questions; it does not establish that any of the three is legally unqualified.
    6. Trinity Street inspector — guest editorial by Francis Gauthier. This piece recounts Gauthier’s September 25 conversation with MacLeay during a visit concerning 10 Trinity Street. It asks what inspection experience, certifications, training, and supervision MacLeay has, and whether the city’s records support assigning him enforcement duties. It calls for documents that can settle those questions rather than treating the street-side conversation as proof of his qualifications.

    The common thread is records and accountability: school finances, the audit’s actual progress, access to the stipend list, council decisions, and the qualifications behind city enforcement work. Proverbs 18:13 cautions against answering a matter before hearing it; here, the practical step is to get the underlying records before reaching a verdict.

  • Ai puppy (Sunday, September 27 26 10:01 pm EDT)

    nice typos dumbass

  • Jim Sullivan (Sunday, September 27 26 09:59 pm EDT)

    Six new articles published today on the News Flashes page of this website.

    1) The Claremont School Board Finance Sub-Committee Members are hiding disastrous news about the Claremont School District's Current Year Budget!

    2) Guest Editorial – The Forensic Audit That Took a Tour of Claremont without laving the Office.

    3) Still Waiting – Part #3!

    4) Public continues to rise up in greater numbers to give Claremont City Councilors Hell for terrible leadership!

    5) Are city of Claremont's 3 latest hires qualified?

    6) Guest Editorial – The Clipboard Came First – Did the Credentials Come Later?

  • fran@claremontnh.ai (Sunday, September 27 26 12:53 pm EDT)

    fran is predictable boring with every ai copy and paste
    why waste time with copying and pasting what no one will read

  • ai puppy (Sunday, September 27 26 08:15 am EDT)

    liberals are just puritans with blue hair

  • Claremont Grinder (Sunday, September 27 26 05:45 am EDT)

    The local grinder community endorses Dale Girard. He's our kind of guy. Especially when he is in his cowboy outfit!

  • Telefreko (Sunday, September 27 26 05:37 am EDT)

    Like any of you wouldn't date a high school girl if you could! The only difference between Jon Stone and you is that he had the stones to go for it and closed the deal.

    Donald Trump can grab them by the pussy and they let him do it!! Jon Stone can pick up high schoolers if he wants. Consent in NH is 16 people. You're just jealous.

    It's high T alphas like Jon Stone and Donald against you soy boys. I want my representatives to be a guys guys that can grab or get pussy. Not some Telefreko or Pappas metrosexual.

    I agree that Dale is a piece of shit. We don't need that fag democrat in sheeps clothing trying to get elected as a republican because people won't look into him and just look for the republican. Look at the shit hole he has made claremont into. Just say no to him.

  • Vote No on the Pervert Pair (Sunday, September 27 26 05:31 am EDT)

    Jon Stone threatened to RAPE the police chief's wife, MURDER the police chief, and shot up the police station. Why? Because they were investigating him for having an inappropriate relationship with an UNDERAGE girl. This is known facts. Read the eyewitness reports in the police reports.

    And our mayor is out there holding political signs to try to get that pervert elected to congress.

    Fuck Jon Stone and Dale Girard for their perverted stands. Time to vote for anyone else then that pair of perverts.

  • creepy (Wednesday, September 23 26 04:50 pm EDT)

    public fornication
    is that allowed in the park

  • Mike (Wednesday, September 23 26 04:30 pm EDT)

    The rumor around city hall was they had a choice between two people for deputy building inspector & health officer; the one they chose was the nearly 30-year-old dude with a star nose ring holding a pink stuffed animal, and the other was the homeless guy with the blue cart who happens to live at Broad Street Park. The guy with the blue cart was actually the first choice, unfortunately he was too busy finger-popping his girlfriend in public.

  • creepy (Wednesday, September 23 26 12:36 pm EDT)

    does the city not do background checks or interviews for their new hires any more?

  • ai puppy (Tuesday, September 22 26 05:24 pm EDT)

    guess what ai baby is copying and pasting more articles
    loser

  • Mustache Sniffer (Tuesday, September 22 26 03:22 pm EDT)

    Nick K has a mustache

  • Harry (Tuesday, September 22 26 01:57 pm EDT)

    Why can’t we just hire normal people anymore.

  • Creepy inspector (Tuesday, September 22 26 09:32 am EDT)

    Instead of watch your kids it’s more like watch you animals with this inspector.

  • creepy (Monday, September 21 26 02:31 pm EDT)

    lmao what a joke
    there is a story to follow on this “inspector”

  • Larry (Monday, September 21 26 11:38 am EDT)

    Looks like a pretty gay building inspector. Just another joke of an employee.

    What’s that make 4 inspectors now?

  • No I in Francis's AI Articles (Monday, September 21 26 08:21 am EDT)

    Agreed, I just skip the FrankGPT articles entirely.

  • Tomas (Sunday, September 20 26 06:41 pm EDT)

    I immediately skipped over the two articles from Francis. Just don’t have any interest in reading his AI generated diatribes.

    PS, Whitewater dam has been fully repaired.

  • Jim Sullivan (Sunday, September 20 26 06:20 pm EDT)

    11 new articles published today on the News Flashes page of this website.

    1) September 16, 2026 Claremont School Board meeting is a mixed bag!

    2) Claremont School Board Finance Committee Members are covering up their plans for the next School Budget!

    3) Guest Editorial – The Woman at the Toll Booth.

    4) Still Waiting – The Sequel!

    5) Is there were more cost-effective way to educate the Students of Claremont?

    6) Portrait Unveiling.

    7) Nine New Living Units Approve for Downtown Claremont!

    8) Less and Less Is Getting Done under Rick Bergeron So-Called "City Management"!

    9) Claremont City Officials continue to ignore Public Safety Danger at 127 Sullivan St.!

    10) Meet Claremont's New Deputy Building Inspector & Health Officer!

    11) Guest Editorial – Claremont Watchdog: City Hall Finally Buys a Better Flashlight.

  • Todd (Sunday, September 20 26 04:15 pm EDT)

    "welcome" I'm not surprised; just a few weeks ago a homeless man was sleeping in the bus stop at the visitor center and blocking it and preventing others from using it.

  • Mike (Sunday, September 20 26 04:00 pm EDT)

    Fake Outrage - Pretending one is offended, insulted or generally affronted by something which they really are not. The fake outrage is usually expressed publicly because it is done in the service of an agenda. Those expressing fake outrage usually labor under the delusion that no one can see through them, but most can.

  • BURN IN HELL, DALE (Sunday, September 20 26 02:33 pm EDT)

    Jon Stone is a proven predator.

    And our mayor, Dale Girard, is out holding campaign signs for that pervert.

    I'm out of this town. My kids aren't safe when we have a ex-police office running around "dating" young girls, threatening to rape a woman, and threatening to shot places up.

    And my kids REALLY aren't safe when the sick Mayor is out campaigning for that pervert.

    Dale has gotta go. The dude is a sick piece of shit that doesn't give a fuck about your kids. not one fuck. Or your wife; he's fine if that physco threatens to murder your wife if you want him investigated for his crimes.

  • Real Truth (Sunday, September 20 26 02:29 pm EDT)

    "Truth": why would i go near that physco pedo piece of shit, Jon Stone? The only acceptable thing to say to him, EVER, is: however close you are the nearest child PEDO back the fuck up and get further away!!

    Jon Stone is a fucking monster.

    Dale Girard actively campaigns for that pedo. He needs to be removed from office to. What s sick son of a bitch, both of them.

    I don't support those who threaten to RAPE the wife of the police chief, as Jon Stone did.

    And I don't support perverts like Dale Girard that prance around town campaigning for the perv Jon Stone.

    And I don't support pervs like Dale Girard that prance around trying to get a male model from Massachuests elected to a NH senate position.

  • Welcome (Sunday, September 20 26 02:21 pm EDT)

    Drug needles found at the visitor center parking lot yesterday morning, welcome to Claremont!

  • Fuck you (Saturday, September 19 26 11:08 pm EDT)

    Jim Sullivan is another closet homosexual, he is a retard who thinks his opinion matter to the low functioning of Claremont like Francis Gauthier. You both are a fucking joke.

Print | Sitemap
RESTORING BALANCE THROUGH FULL DISCLOSURE

Web ViewMobile View

Logout | Edit page